According to the strengths of dualism, what is necessary for controlling desires?

Dualism posits a fundamental distinction between the mind and body, suggesting that mental states are not identical to physical states. Within this framework, reason is considered necessary for controlling desires because it represents the rational aspect of the mind that can evaluate, assess, and regulate emotional and physical impulses.

In the dualistic view, desires may arise from our bodily instincts and emotional responses. However, to achieve effective self-control and make morally sound decisions, one must employ reason. Reason enables individuals to reflect on their desires, weigh the consequences of acting upon them, and determine whether those desires align with their broader values and objectives. Thus, reason acts as a guiding force that can prioritize long-term well-being over immediate gratification.

While instinct, desire, and intuition play roles in human behavior, they do not provide the same level of deliberation and evaluation that reason does. Instincts may prompt immediate reactions without thoughtful consideration, and desires themselves might not consider the broader impact on oneself or others. Intuition, while potentially insightful, lacks the systematic analytical power that reason offers in making nuanced decisions. Consequently, reason stands out in the dualistic analysis of human behavior as the essential tool for regulating and controlling desires effectively.