What aspect of existence does the Cosmological Argument focus on?

The Cosmological Argument focuses specifically on the concepts of contingency and necessity of beings. This philosophical argument is fundamentally concerned with the nature of existence, particularly why things exist rather than nothing. It examines the distinction between contingent beings, which depend on something else for their existence, and the necessary being, which exists independently and does not rely on anything else for its existence. Proponents of the Cosmological Argument, such as Aquinas, argue that because contingent beings exist, there must be a necessary cause or being that initiated existence. This necessary being is often identified with God, serving as the ultimate explanation for why the universe and all contingent beings within it exist.

In contrast, the other options delve into different philosophical issues. The characteristics of human morality relate more closely to ethical discussions rather than the fundamental questions of existence. Natural laws and their explanations involve scientific inquiries into the workings of the universe rather than the foundational cause of existence itself. The inherent value of life deals with subjective interpretations of life’s worth, which is distinct from the metaphysical questions raised by the Cosmological Argument. Thus, the argument's sole focus is on the interplay between contingency and necessity in relation to existence.