What does the notion of 'theological knowledge vs practical knowledge' refer to in the debate on omniscience?

The notion of 'theological knowledge vs practical knowledge' in the context of the debate on omniscience refers to the distinction between cognitive and experiential knowledge. This distinction is important in understanding how God's omniscience is conceptualized.

Cognitive knowledge denotes an understanding of facts, concepts, or theoretical truths—essentially, knowledge that can be articulated and reasoned about. In theological discussions, this reflects God's comprehensive knowledge of all truths, including abstract concepts and the ultimate truths about existence.

On the other hand, practical knowledge encompasses the knowledge gained through experience and practice, often related to how one behaves or interacts in the world. This form of knowledge can imply a deeper understanding of situations through lived experiences and the application of knowledge in real-life scenarios.

The debate surrounding omniscience often tackles whether God's knowledge is purely cognitive, encompassing all facts and truths, or if it includes a form of experiential knowledge gained through human experiences. Thus, recognizing the difference between these two types of knowledge helps clarify discussions about how and what God knows about the human condition and the world.

The other options do not accurately capture this distinction. Some suggest limited aspects of God's knowledge or focus, but they do not adequately explain the rich interplay between cognitive and experiential knowledge as it pertains to