What statement best reflects the view that religious language can reach a true understanding of God?

The statement that most effectively conveys the notion that religious language can authentically capture an understanding of God is that religious language accurately reflects divine reality. This view asserts that the words and expressions found in religious discourse can indeed convey truths about God and the divine nature. Proponents of this view argue that, despite the challenges posed by the infinite and transcendent nature of God, religious language can still serve as a meaningful medium to express theological concepts and beliefs.

The other options indicate varying perspectives on the efficacy of religious language. The idea of religious language being purely subjective suggests a lack of objective truth in religious expressions, which contrasts with the belief in their ability to reflect a true understanding of God. Recognizing that human language has limits indicates an acknowledgment that while it may convey some truths about the divine, it cannot fully encapsulate the entirety of God's nature; this positions human language as an imperfect tool rather than one that accurately conveys divine reality. Lastly, the belief that religious language holds universal meaning implies that it is comprehensible across different cultures and contexts, which does not directly address the capacity of such language to truthfully depict the essence of God. Thus, the perspective that aligns best with the view of religious language as successfully reaching a true understanding of God emphasizes its potential