Which of the following best summarizes Aristotle's stance on knowledge acquisition?

Aristotle's stance on knowledge acquisition emphasizes empirical observation and the importance of the natural world in forming knowledge. He argued that knowledge is not something we are born with, but rather is developed through our interactions with the environment around us. By observing phenomena, conducting experiments, and engaging in systematic inquiry, individuals can gather data that leads to understanding and knowledge. This perspective underscores the significance of sensory experience as a foundation for learning, which is central to Aristotle's epistemology.

In contrast, the other options do not align with Aristotle's views. The notion of innate knowledge suggests that knowledge is pre-existing and unchangeable, which Aristotle would contest because he believed knowledge comes from experience rather than inborn ideas. Additionally, the idea that knowledge is independent of sensory experience contradicts his empirical approach, as he maintained that observation is crucial to understanding the world. Lastly, stating that knowledge is often unreliable and subjective does not resonate with Aristotle's belief in objective knowledge derived from systematic study of the natural world, aiming for a more stable and reliable understanding. Thus, the correct answer accurately reflects Aristotle's empirical method of knowledge acquisition through observation.