Which of the following best captures the essence of absolute omnipotence according to Descartes?

The essence of absolute omnipotence, particularly in the context of Descartes' philosophy, suggests that God's nature is not constrained by the laws of logic or even by the definitions of morality. Descartes viewed God as the ultimate source of reality, and thus God's existence is not dependent on logical structures that humans have established. This perspective allows for the notion that God transcends conventional logic.

In this view, God's omnipotence includes the capacity to act outside of human comprehension of logic and morality. While logical principles may govern the natural world, they do not bind God. Instead, God defines what is possible and impossible, and as such, His existence is fundamentally independent of those logical constraints. This understanding positions God as possessing an absolute form of power that is not limited by human reasoning or ethical frameworks.

The other options fail to capture this essence of absolute omnipotence, as they all suggest some form of limitation on God's power, whether by logic or moral principles. This would imply a certain dependence on human ideas, which contradicts the notion of a being that possesses absolute and unbounded power.