Which philosopher questioned the validity of religious experiences by highlighting the role of personal ignorance and attention-seeking?

The correct answer is not B; instead, it is more aligned with the critical perspectives of other philosophers known for their skepticism regarding religious experiences. The philosopher who specifically questioned the validity of religious experiences by emphasizing the impact of personal ignorance and the potential for attention-seeking behavior is often William James.

James explored religious experiences in his work "The Varieties of Religious Experience," where he examined how such experiences could be influenced by psychological factors, including personal context and the intrinsic desires of individuals. He was interested in understanding the subjective nature of religious experiences and considered how personal biases could affect one's interpretation and validation of these experiences.

By analyzing the role of personal ignorance, James pointed out that individuals might not fully understand the origins or implications of their experiences, which could lead to misguided interpretations. He also acknowledged the possibility that some individuals might engage in religious experiences partly to gain social recognition or fulfill psychological needs, thus questioning their authenticity and the conclusions drawn from them.

This nuanced approach offers a significant critique of religious experiences by suggesting that they may be less about divine interactions and more due to individual psychological states or social dynamics.